Where the estimate is the product, and make-ready is most of the cost on a short run.

Early access

CubeERP for print & packaging

ERP for printers and packaging converters - estimating that reflects make-ready, substrate stock, artwork approval and waste that is measured.

Print and packaging estimating is unusually unforgiving: run length, substrate, colours, finishing and make-ready interact, and a rule of thumb that works at ten thousand loses money at five hundred.

CubeERP models the job properly - substrate by area or weight, make-ready separated from run, finishing operations sequenced, waste captured as a real figure rather than a percentage assumption - and then reports what the job actually cost against the estimate that won it.

  • Separated

    Make-ready priced apart from run

  • Per reel

    Substrate and remnant tracking

  • Measured

    Waste against estimate, by job

What goes wrong

The recurring problems in print

Not every business has all five. Almost every business we speak to has three.

  • Estimates that ignore run length

    Make-ready is a fixed cost spread over the run. Applying an average rate makes short runs quietly unprofitable and long runs uncompetitive.

  • Substrate stock in reels and sheets

    Part reels and part pallets are physically present and systemically invisible, so material is bought that already exists in the racking.

  • Artwork approval by email

    Proof approvals sit in inboxes. When a job is printed to an unapproved version, the cost of the reprint is entirely avoidable and entirely borne by you.

  • Waste as an assumption

    A standard waste percentage is applied at estimate and never compared with actual. The gap between the two is real money and nobody is measuring it.

  • Finishing planned separately

    Print is scheduled properly and finishing is planned informally, so the constraint moves to the department nobody is looking at.

What we do about it

How CubeERP is set up for print

Configuration, not a separate edition. Everything here is in the same product - it is switched on and shaped during implementation.

  • Estimating that models the job

    Substrate by area or weight, colours, plates, make-ready separated from run speed, finishing operations and outwork - priced per quantity break automatically.

  • Reels, sheets and remnants

    Substrate tracked by reel and pallet with part-reel management, so usable stock is found before more is ordered.

  • Artwork and approvals

    Artwork versions held against the job with a recorded approval, so what goes to plate is what the customer signed off, with a timestamp to prove it.

  • Scheduling through finishing

    Press and finishing scheduled together, with sequencing by substrate and colour to cut make-ready across the whole route rather than one department.

  • Waste actually captured

    Set-up waste and run waste booked at the press with a reason, then compared with the estimate so the standard can be corrected with evidence.

  • Job cost against estimate

    Every job reports material, make-ready, run, finishing and outwork against what was quoted, by customer and by product type.

In practice

Two situations from this sector

Anonymised, but not invented. These are the situations businesses describe before they change anything.

  • Short runs winning and losing

    The situation

    A label printer used an average hourly rate covering make-ready and run together. Short-run work was easy to win and, once measured, largely unprofitable.

    What changed

    Make-ready was separated from run time in estimating. Short-run pricing rose, some work was lost, and gross margin improved because the work retained was worth having.

  • A reprint that was nobody’s fault

    The situation

    A job was printed from an artwork version superseded two days earlier. The approval email existed; the version on the plate did not match it.

    What changed

    Artwork versions and approvals are held on the job and plating requires the approved version. Reprints caused by version confusion stopped.

How it happens

What implementation involves

The same five stages whatever you make. Discovery, training and go-live are done on your site, because most of what the system needs to know is learned in the building.

  1. 1

    Discovery

    A structured session mapping how you work now - the systems, the spreadsheets and the bits held together by one person’s memory. We come back with what the platform covers as standard, what needs configuration, and what needs building.

  2. 2

    Configuration

    Your sites, warehouses, price lists, approval limits, document templates, workflows and permissions set up to match the business - not a demo tenant with your logo dropped on it.

  3. 3

    Data migration

    Customers, suppliers, parts, bills of materials, price lists, open orders and stock balances brought across and reconciled. We migrate, you check the numbers against the old system, and only then do we cut over.

  4. 4

    Training & rollout

    Role-based training so the order desk learns the order desk and the warehouse learns the warehouse, with a pilot group first where it makes sense. Documentation and short screen recordings left behind for new starters.

  5. 5

    Ongoing support

    UK support from the people who built the platform, with a named contact, agreed response times, and a product roadmap you can influence.

Questions

What this sector asks first

  • Both, in the sense that matters: estimating, scheduling and job costing sit alongside stock, purchasing and invoicing in one system, so there is no interface between the print side and the commercial side.

  • Yes. A single estimate produces prices across quantity breaks with make-ready correctly spread, so the customer gets a proper price ladder rather than a linear guess.

  • Yes. Outwork is a routing operation with its own purchase order and lead time, tracked on the job so the schedule reflects it.

  • Batch traceability through substrate, ink and finished product is supported, including certification where food-contact packaging requires it.

  • Yes, via the API - impressions, waste and downtime can be posted directly from press systems rather than transcribed from a sheet.

If your process really is unusual

Some requirements are specific to one business rather than one sector. Those get built against the same documented API everybody else uses - not bolted on to the side of a database nobody is allowed to look at.

How the platform is built

Print

Show us a real job from your print operation

Bring one order that went wrong and the paperwork that went with it. That tells us more about whether this fits than any list of features.